Tsipras’ new ELAS: A shock of honesty, but rehearsed
Alexis Tsipras is making a comeback in Greek politics with a kaleidoscope of gestures, symbols and references that are carefully considered and, at times, unintentionally ironic. His ELAS party promises “a shock of honesty” and is challenging New Democracy. OBCT spoke exclusively to its new deputy spokesperson, Giorgos Balatsoukas

Alexis Tsipras with Giorgos Balatsoukas – courtesy of G. Balatsoukas
Alexis Tsipras with Giorgos Balatsoukas – courtesy of G. Balatsoukas
Athens has seen this trick before, which is rather the point.
On the evening of May 26, 2026, Alexis Tsipras stood in Thiseio Square to unveil his return to active politics, a script trailed for months through a memoir, a website, and a slow drip of manifestos.
The unveiling came with original music and the Acropolis as backdrop. Then came the moment Greek commentators reached for immediately: a young girl walked onto the stage and handed Tsipras a piece of paper bearing the party’s name — a gesture several outlets noted explicitly echoed Andreas Papandreou’s “little Anna,” who handed PASOK its own name in 1985. The choreography was not subtext. It was footnoted by the press in real time.
The name does triple duty, which shows either considerable cheek or a failure of focus-grouping. ΕΛΑΣ — Ελληνική Αριστερή Συμπαράταξη, the Hellenic Left Coalition — collapses into the word for Greece itself, while resurrecting the initials of the WWII-era resistance army, EAM-ELAS, a lineage the party leans into rather than disguises.
Tsipras specified the colors would fuse Greece’s blue with the red of popular struggle; a chromatic synthesis recalling PASOK’s old trick of binding the national to the socialist into one unthreatening palette.
What goes mostly unspoken is that ΕΛΑΣ is also the everyday acronym for the Hellenic Police, an irony that has not escaped the party’s critics, even if it hasn’t dented the brand.
The founding declaration, signed two days later at the Areios Pagos, was accompanied by Maria Lepenioti, who had presided over the Golden Dawn trial — a presence calculated to signal continuity with one of the more genuinely consequential achievements of Tsipras’ years in office. It is a launch built as much on selective memory as on rupture.
Substantively, the declaration positions the party as a “governing left” synthesizing social democracy, the radical left and political ecology under a “new patriotism” tied to social justice and democracy, organized around seven core commitments.
Tsipras told the crowd that the country needed “a shock of honesty and democracy,” invoking the loaded language of “a new Metapolitefsi”. The Greek word he used for honesty, “εντιμότητα” (entimótita), sits closer to “integrity” or “righteousness,” the moral standing of someone who has not lied to you.
That distinction matters in 2026 Greece. The word lands differently in a country still working through the aftermath of the Tempi train disaster, where grieving families and a wide swath of the public came to believe that official explanations had been managed, delayed, or quietly rewritten; that they had, in plain terms, been fed a story rather than the truth.
Invoking honesty so soon after Tempi is not incidental; it is Tsipras reaching for the precise register of betrayal that has defined Greek public sentiment for the past two years, and asking voters to believe that he, alone among the political class, will not lie to them again. Whether his own record entitles him to make that claim is a separate question.
Tsipras governed Greece between 2015 and 2019 and that record is not a footnote on the way to “new patriotism.” It includes the volte-face of the July 2015 referendum, where a resounding “no” to austerity was followed within days by a harsher memorandum than the one rejected; the Novartis affair, still cited as an example of the institutional weaponization ΕΛΑΣ‘s rhetoric claims to oppose; and a government that presided over capital controls and a deep sense of betrayal among voters who took “όχι” (“no”) at face value.
The opposition has weaponized exactly this gap: New Democracy’s Adonis Georgiadis asked pointedly “why a return to communist roots required foreign consultants and rebranding at all”. The critique lands: a manifesto promising honesty arrives from a leader whose record includes negotiated retreats and unresolved scandal.
A GPO poll conducted for Star Channel and published in June 2026 offers the clearest read yet on the reshuffled landscape. New Democracy leads with 28.6% in vote estimation, though the figure marks a decline from the party’s March standing.
ELAS holds a stable second place at 15.1%, with PASOK trailing in third at 12.4% — and, notably, Maria Karystianou’s newly launched “Hope for Democracy,” another product of this spring’s reshuffling, already in fourth at 10.5%. Second place, in other words, has become contested terrain rather than settled fact.
The apprentice from Myrofyllo
If Tsipras supplies the symbolism, Giorgos Balatsoukas – his new deputy spokesperson – supplies the alibi. The criminal defense lawyer from Trikala, by way of the mountain village of Myrofyllo, was recruited quietly months before ΕΛΑΣ had a name.
His CV reads like a man built for this: an LLM in European Criminal Law, a secretaryship in Thessaloniki’s law students’ association, and — as a student himself — co-founding “Το Ρολόι των Νέων (“literally “The Youth Clock”); a youth simulation of the municipal council that occasionally produces people who actually run for office. He has.
Balatsoukas’ father commanded the regional fire service; the son chose courtrooms instead, but the instinct toward institutions seems to have passed down intact. His manner owes less to stump rhetoric than to cross-examination — understated, faintly ironic, the kind of dry precision a young criminal lawyer develops fast, watching the gap between what people say and what actually happened, and learning to let that gap speak for itself rather than narrate it.
Asked what persuaded him to trade the courtroom for opposition politics, he answered like a lawyer rather than a candidate: “I’ve learned to read the difference between facts and impressions, between law and expediency.” It is precision standing in for sentiment.
What convinced him, he says, was the authenticity of the demand for a “shock of honesty”, not the brand attached to it. He is careful to specify what didn’t convince him — not a career move, not the candidacy Trikala’s political circles already treat as settled.
He defines success modestly: shifting public debate toward transparency, persuading citizens that politics can again be a calling rather than a privilege of the few. “Success, for me, is the return of ethics to public life” — a line that could easily read as a platitude, were it not coming from a man whose day job consists of cross-examining exactly the daylight between what people claim and what they did.
Which returns us to 1985. Papandreou’s “little Anna” worked as dynastic theater, a torch passed within an unbroken line of authority. Tsipras’ restaging is a stranger move: a borrowed pageantry of succession deployed not by an incumbent but by a returning challenger, manufacturing the weight of continuity for a party that, by its own declaration, claims to be starting over.
Whether Greek voters read that as inheritance or imitation, and whether Balatsoukas’s generation lends the project genuine renewal or merely its alibi, is the question ΕΛΑΣ has yet to answer.
Featured articles
- Global Sumud Flotilla
- Civil society
- the big looting









